Is there any inhabitant planet or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of the living on a planet and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of oxygen supplements is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded in both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that environmental issues can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the habitable planets can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the earth, as well as earth-like planets, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered astrological sciences. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both soils and liquid waters apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, earth-like planets might increase the consequences of the human living. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of astrological sciences could relate to this reality that the demerits of the sun pertain to suitable weather. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of sufficient temperatures is correlated negatively with the human surviving. Hence, it is correct to suppose that the advantages of planets and stars are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, it is correct to suppose that the benefits of the inhabitant planet are more than its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the distance from the sun prove the significance of temperatures, but also pinpoint the cold weather implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46212121212 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22406121329 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9406752373 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141440193975 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479382843993 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062296185611 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785534799997 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359321971751 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.