In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss
Replacing the small local shops by large shopping malls in cities has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of large shopping malls has sparked a controversy over the potential impact of this trend on small local shops in recent years. It can be said that shopping malls should replace local shops. However, some people claim that malls should not replace the small shops. This essay will elaborate on how shopping malls save time, and also how it kills the local economy and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why large shopping malls should replace local shops, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that large shopping malls save time. Furthermore, they have a variety of stores for one to buy all their daily needs from under one roof. For instance, Westfield in Australia has a wide range of stores for groceries, clothes, shoes, etc. Large shopping malls, therefore, can play a vital role in replacing small shops.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can undoubtedly overwhelm the potential impact of large malls replacing small local shops, but the most alarming one stems from the fact that it kills the local economy. Furthermore, large shopping malls take away the bread out of the mouths of many small shop owners. As an illustration, not many people living in urban areas tend to shop at the local shops nowadays due to the growing mall culture. Therefore, it can play a vital role in large shopping malls, killing the local economy.
To conclude, from what has been discussed above, the impact of large shopping malls replacing local shops is prominent, although the way it kills the local economy should be handled well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22426470588 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9979605777 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525735294118 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8426381944 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.181818182 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400734958509 0.242375264174 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159435184229 0.0925447433944 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928625501695 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257441672034 0.151781067708 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054506640544 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.