People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face-to-face. What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole?
Recently, the phenomenon of doing task by people without meeting other people face to face because of technology and its corresponding impact has sparked the heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of peoples' performance are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the developing technology can be a plus, and I will that analyze throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint the impacts of developing technology on the people's performance every day can provide the society with some noticeable affects which are rooted in facts of merits advantages of individuals, as well as shopping and banking and business transportation are crucial. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed in academic experience which discovered the community. Thus, beneficial ramifications of peoples' duty are visible.
From scientific point of view, the advantages of develop technology on relationship between people can provide the community with negative impacts which are related to this reality that demerits of deduction relationship between individuals are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university of importance. Hence, predicted the outcomes of meeting people in the society are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of visiting people face to face on the society is far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of develop technology prove the significance of society, but also the pinpoint of face to face people possible implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...impacts of developing technology on the peoples performance every day can provide the s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58174904943 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20471197416 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566539923954 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9657615737 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.454545455 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38250657593 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128407346534 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867998520811 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214677226616 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575625526182 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.