Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples?
Recently, the phenomenon of effective learning time requires and it's impossible to combine study and employment, and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the mater of good study is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the impacts of employments on a suitable study can be a plus, and I will investigate throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the negative impacts of employments on the effective study can provide the society with noticeable effects that are rooted in the facts of merits of the benefits of spending suitable time on the study as well as advantages are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed academic experiments that discovered westing time. Tues, beneficial ramifications of spending more time on the study are visible.
From a scientific point of view, distracting people that spent time on the study and employment can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to this reality that demerits of busy people are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described concentrating on the study and education and leaving the job. Hence, predicted outcomes of effective learning are important.
To concluded, while there are several compiling arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that the benefits of managing time for work and study is far outweighed its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of employments prove the importance of distracting people, but also the pinpoint possible implication.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42366412214 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14346519992 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557251908397 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8601803712 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.416666667 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304244531737 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982580307567 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637944714169 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177657041821 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032005118667 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42366412214 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14346519992 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557251908397 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8601803712 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.416666667 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304244531737 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982580307567 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637944714169 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177657041821 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032005118667 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.