People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face-to-face. What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole?
Recently, the phenomenon of doing the task by people such as shopping and banking without meeting other people face to face because of technology and its corresponding impact has sparked the heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of peoples' performance are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that developing technology can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the impacts of developing technology on the people's performance every day can provide the society with noticeable effects that are rooted in facts of merits advantages of individuals, as well as shopping and banking and business transportation are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed in academic experience which discovered the community. Thus, beneficial ramifications of peoples' duty are visible.
From a scientific point of view, the advantages of developing technology on the relationship between people can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to this reality that demerits of deduction relationship between individuals are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university of importance. Hence, predicted the outcomes of meeting people in the society are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of visiting people face to face in society is far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of developing technology prove the significance of society, but also the pinpoint of face to face people possible implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...impacts of developing technology on the peoples performance every day can provide the s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60076045627 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24092689014 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555133079848 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4381799174 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.909090909 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427157416077 0.242375264174 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139088789733 0.0925447433944 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105596103422 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236592442717 0.151781067708 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719411895302 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.