Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of positive and negative impacts and designing of buildings and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested that the matter of adverse impacts and destruction of traditional buildings is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that architecting and designing the new building and modern cities can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
Within the realm of the negative impacts of new buildings, demolishing the traditional building might increase the consequences of old buildings. Moreover, fundamental aspects of towers and buildings relate to this reality that the demerits of architectures pertain to city plans. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the historic building is correlated negatively with losing heritages. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the structures of buildings.
From a social standpoint, new building with modern designs can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the attractive cities, as well as modern towns, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered engineering and paintings of towers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both buildings and painters apparently can be seen.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of building and designing far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of attractive and modern cities substantiate the significance of demolishing the traditional building, but also pinpoint losing heritages implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76702508961 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28453509014 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5448996655 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.083333333 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223880436619 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793582788572 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779699677214 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129454267826 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090990466618 0.0609392437508 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.