Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss
Recently, phenomenon of spending too much time at work and not having time for private life has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the consequences of spending too much time at work?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it does not have important impact on personal life, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the general standpoint, working hours are bound up inextricably with office, which indicates they lead to both spending time with colleague and boss. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between personal experience and healthy life style as well as an exponential increase in family happiness. Their academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of family break is correlated positively with not only children but also close relative.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, normal life attribute to mind health, in that it would come down to less stress, depression, and more relaxation. A salient example of such attribution is hard-working jobs, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take family expenditure for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint ignorance of family's emotional needs problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to close relationship, marital difficulties, and even financial problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of distinguish between personal and professional life.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the drawbacks of spending too much time at work are far outweigh its benefits. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the general standpoint, working hou...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 420, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...heir academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... children but also close relative. Within the realm of psychology, without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en personal and professional life. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 313.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59744408946 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0711235493 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 139.433497537 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654952076677 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5618372385 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.769230769 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390223748745 0.242375264174 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102755678708 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111323154467 0.071462118173 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217575058677 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134480882717 0.0609392437508 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.