Cities are now expanding; the government should make the better network for public transport or should building more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree?
Recently, expanding city has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should the government make better public transport network or building more roads?". Whereas it is a widely held view that improving public transportation is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socio-economic standpoint, expanding cities are bound up inextricably with the public transport development, which indicates they lead to both the overcrowded roads and facilitating car ownership. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between and inadequate private cars as well as an exponential increase in insufficient number of roads. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of the governmental policy is correlated positively with not only improving public transport systems but also car ownership restriction.
within the realm of environment, without the slightest doubt, building roads attribute to the air pollution, in that it would come down to environmentally-friendly policies, traffic congestion, and car accidents. A salient example of such attribution is greenhouse effects, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take carbon dioxide emissions for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint mass transportation problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the better public transit network in people's health.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that better public transportation in more important for city rather than building roads . However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-01 | Mani.Narimani | 77 | view |
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 88
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education, or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition? 85
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education, or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition? 85
- Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
- Companies use advertisement to influence people to buy thing sometimes they don’t need. Give your opinion about this practice? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Within
...l policies but also ownership cars. within the realm of the environment, without t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73958333333 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37859711999 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677083333333 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0741598792 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.272727273 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23638455211 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797453135161 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680860497609 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138571089796 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528472003099 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.