Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should building more roads to facilitate car owner ship? Agree or disagree?
Recently, expanding city has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should the government make better public transport network or building more roads?". Whereas it is a widely held view that improving public transportation is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socio-economic standpoint, expanding cities are bound up inextricably with the public transport development, which indicates they lead to both the overcrowded roads and facilitating car ownership. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between car ownership restriction and inadequate private vehicles as well as an exponential increase in the insufficient number of roads. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of the social policy is correlated positively with not only improving public transport systems but also building roads.
Within the realm of the environment, without the slightest doubt, constructing more roads attribute to governmental policies, in that it would come down to the air pollution, traffic congestion, and car accidents. A salient example of such attribution is greenhouse effects, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take carbon dioxide emissions for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the mass transportation problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the better public transit network.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that developing public transportation in more important for the city rather than building roads. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81379310345 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28216453622 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662068965517 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.293821452 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.272727273 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306511144256 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973456302825 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867707000733 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169660760459 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684115922093 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.