Companies use advertisement to influence people to buy thing sometimes they don’t need. Give your opinion about this practice?
Recently, the phenomenon of advertisement has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Does it influence people to buy things or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that companies' advertising affects people to buy additional things, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socio-economic standpoint, advertising products are bound up inextricably with marketing policies, which indicates they lead to both comparative advantages and boosting sales. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between encouraging individuals and temptation people as well as an exponential increase in becoming materialistic. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of buying commodities is correlated positively with not only sales figures but also companies' efforts.
Within the realm of marketing and commercial policies, without the slightest doubt, influential advertisements attribute to the political propaganda, in that it would come down to the online shopping, buying unnecessary things, and social networking. A salient example of such attribution is digital marketing, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take the e-commerce for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the commercial problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of advertisement in people's decision making.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that advertisements have many adverse effects on people. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ship between encouraging individuals and temptation people as well as an exponent...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88602941176 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30749769189 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.705882352941 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6072082882 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.545454545 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195000692066 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646725658972 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677128672806 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112799322516 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940322859768 0.0609392437508 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.5 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.94827586207 176% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.