Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of employees who are involved in decision-making policy in many companies and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the importance of progression of the company by involving employees in decision-making policy can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, involving employees in companies’ decision-making policy and the importance of progression of the company can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the involvement of employees in decision-making policy might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of employees are involving in companies’ decision-making policy far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-11 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-13 | sara malla | 77 | view |
- With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value for artists such as musicians and painters. What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Why should we encourage the art area? 85
- Television has two roles to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point view with details from your own exp 88
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books. Experimental learning or traditional learning in high school and university, which one do you agree is more effective? 85
- In today’s world, different government and international organization are confronting many problems. What is the most pressing problem among them? 75
- Do you think people need to learn how to spend their money from early ages at school? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... believe that the benefits of employees are involving in companies' decision-making poli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91605839416 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5484157304 2.71678728327 131% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605839416058 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0659966457 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.363636364 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251126608368 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905399413029 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879813469601 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151214654692 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512899756671 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.