In today’s world, different government and international organization are confronting many problems. What is the most pressing problem among them?
Recently, the pheomenon of confronting some government and international organization with many problems in today's world and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the phenomenon of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that facing with different problems by international organization and government can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, takling with some tremendous problems in today's world by the majority of international institutions and governments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a general arena, international organization and some governments confronting with diveres problems nowadays might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling aguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of confronting with pressing problems with goverments and different international associations far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01433691756 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40968553878 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8025757976 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.545454545 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233244634958 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868177432603 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100465201675 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144663781979 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807819236376 0.0609392437508 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 12.6369458128 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 11.5310837438 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.