The controversial topic with respect to employee engagement never fails to attract public attention. There has been a heated debate on whether organization should involve employees in decision – making process. As far as I am concerned, I tend to be the advocate regarding this issue.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that this approach is of great value due to the fact that employees tend to be highly motivated and hence boost the productivity. This is because they are valued as significant contributors to the team success, and there is stronger bond of responsibility for making the decision.to illustrate this, IBM is a convincing example. when people know they make a difference, they find it easier to be motivated and satisfied with their job. As a result, such an approach raises their level of effort and commitment.
In contrast, it is commonly believed as a fact that this practice would be time consuming as more people involved in this process, and it is difficult to gain trust from the manager. Nevertheless, this argument does not hold water. It should be pointed out that Decision making process gives each employee the opportunity to voice their opinions. That is to say, this improves the relationship between manager and employee, which leads to an increase in effectiveness, and ultimately an increase in good teamwork and performance.
In a nutshell, due to the mentioned reasons, we may safely reach the conclusion that the advantages of employee involvement in decision making are many in number. Despite the fact that conflicts may occur, this practices is beneficial in terms of improving morale and teamwork performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at employees tend to be highly motivated and hence boost the productivity. This i...
^^^
Line 2, column 376, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...rate this, IBM is a convincing example. when people know they make a difference, the...
^^^^
Line 6, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the fact that conflicts may occur, this practices is beneficial in terms of impr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, in contrast, as a result, with respect to, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15808823529 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02408646376 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580882352941 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.6157635468 238% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.639115564 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.923076923 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198697934515 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686987263517 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446240381922 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123321033306 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112210748396 0.0609392437508 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.