The controversial topic with respect to promote certain kinds of music promote learning among youngster never fails to attract public attention. There has been a heated debate on whether music promote learning habit or not among the children. As far as I am concerned, I tend to be the advocate regarding this issue.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that this approach is of great value due to the fact that develop key skills like creativity, imaging and personality. This is because music creates a platform to learn new creative things. To illustrate this, on my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment on music which discovered the influence of music in social and professional life is a convincing example. As a result, it makes a student active in the social fields.
In contract, it is commonly believed as a fact that everything had some negative sides too. Sometimes Music makes student less concentration in other academic syllabus. Nevertheless, this argument does not hold water. It should be pointed out that Music enhance knowledge about different culture and improving a habit of teamwork. That is to say, this will help students to build up their career and give a sense of motivation.
In a nutshell, due to the mentioned reasons, we may safely reach the conclusion that the advantages of certain kind of music among students are many in number. Despite the fact that music may have some negative side but is beneficial in terms of improving morale and teamwork performance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, kind of, as a result, with respect to, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01930501931 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86281394811 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6138996139 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.6157635468 238% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2763059177 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8571428571 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236849466834 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758962234609 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954311014706 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148539465343 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994429790122 0.0609392437508 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 69.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 62.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.