Do you think people need to learn how to spend their money from early ages at school?
Recently, spending money at an early age has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “Do people need to learn how to manage their money?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that people should control spending the money, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socioeconomic standpoint, early ages are bound up inextricably with learning how to spend money, which indicates they lead to both monetary systems and business links. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between saving money and financial budgets as well as an exponential increase in living costs. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of teaching children is correlated with not only self-confidence but also tackling expenses.
Within the realm of the education, without the slightest doubt, people needs attribute to the educational experience, in that it would come down to the proper schooling, social policies, and banking systems. A salient example of such attribution is the knowledge improvement, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take the better future for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint financial problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the tuition student to manage their budgets and living costs.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that learning to manage money from an early age is vital. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45744680851 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06458693363 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659574468085 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.9133387656 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.909090909 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293469694905 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906092231371 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118970148669 0.071462118173 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167543729129 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122719466247 0.0609392437508 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.