More and more students are studying at universities abroad, either because it is cheaper, or because they feel they can receive a better education, or because it will provide them with greater professional opportunities. Which one do you think is the most?
Recently, the phenomenon of studying students at abroad universities because of being cheaper, receiving the better education and greater professional opportunities and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a number of substantial individuals. I am inclined to believe that the studying students at abroad universities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, better education, greater professional opportunities by studying students at abroad universities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, students at abroad universities with greater professional opportunities and better education might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of studying students for having factors such as being cheaper, receiving the better education and greater professional opportunities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ecently
ecently, the phenomenon of studying students at...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99295774648 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33414821753 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602112676056 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2873285481 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.727272727 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279717997459 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984960407398 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915389638789 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164693079164 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530266726113 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 12.6369458128 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.76 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.