As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp

Essay topics:
As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp

With the increase in population people are moving away from cities expanding to suburban areas. To deal with the increase in the population many people believe that governments should focus more on improving the public transportation rather than spending money on constructing roads for private owners of vehicles. In the coming paragraphs, I would explain my opinions and perspectives.

Firstly, it is an inevitable fact that over-population is causing majority of the people to reside in far-flung areas, hence, comes the demands for constructing new roads to fulfill the demand of over crowded vehicles. People are also owning more vehicles than ever before leading to some other crucial muddles linked with it. Private car owners are increasing at a rapid rate. So, many governments have started running projects to construct the roads and bridges.

Secondly on the other side, I personally believe that governments should focus more on promoting public vehicles. By promoting public vehicles governments can solve many issues related to environmental threats. Although, the usage of public transport has improved a lot in the last years, but, still in many places the access to the public transport is not achievable. For example, in countries such as China, United States, the public transportation services are impeccable and cheaper almost 60-70% of the population residing in these countries uses public transport to commute.

Henceforth, the advantages of promoting public transport outweigh the promotion of constructing roads. Thus, it is advisable for any government to promote the use of public transport and let people understand the true value of public transportation.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...demand of over crowded vehicles. People are also owning more vehicles than ever before leading ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51923076923 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99153391221 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573076923077 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6339080181 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.384615385 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266966358759 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916383261645 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600132285781 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163527436371 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208879968692 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.