Nowadays, it is increasingly acknowledged that the traffic problem is one of the biggest issues which the government is facing. While some people believed that building more roads will be the solution, others advocate public transport is what the office department should promote. As far as I am concerned, creating a better network of public transportation system will be more beneficial in respect of this issue.
People who emphasize the importance of building more freeways in the cities are primarily focusing on decreasing the congestion in the urban area. Nevertheless, this argument cannot hold water. This is because most people work in a suburb close to where they live. Hence, congestion is a problem in downtowns instead of rural areas where freeways may play a role.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that the public transportation system has more advantages. First of all, it decreases the roads congestion. If more people travel by train, tram or bus, thus few cars we will have on the road. Moreover, it could decline the burning of fossil fuels, which improves the air quality and reduces our risk of suffering from illnesses related to air pollution. On the other hand, it can also reduce the carbon emission, which is the main reason for global warming and climate changes.
In a nutshell, while this controversial topic never fails to attract public attention, we can safely reach the conclusion that there is a need for government to put money in developing public transport network instead of building more roads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...antages. First of all, it decreases the roads congestion. If more people travel by tr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1137254902 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79643866447 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61568627451 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7010031062 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.307692308 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248086093614 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764307131254 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718483900082 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141788433537 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063526935206 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.