The advanced medical technology will expand human’s life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
Nowadays, it is increasingly acknowledged the relationship between medical technology and longevity. While some people believe that it is good to extend life expectancy with medical technology, others advocate that too longevity may cause many problems. As far as I am concerned, having an appropriate length of life is more beneficial in respect of this issue.
People who emphasize the importance of longevity are primarily focusing on having more time to fulfil one’s dream.
The main justification of this view is that living longer means people can stay with their family longer and enjoy a happy later life. Nevertheless, this argument cannot hold water.
According to statistics, too many elderly people will result huge burden on a family’s financial situation.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that too longevity is more disadvantageous in our society. It causes increased in population and creates so many issues like poverty in people and the lack of basic facilities. The main reason is that, it will form an aging society in which more and more people live longer. Hence, the aging population will put some financial pressure on the government and medical system. For instance, the government will not only need to build more aged care center, but also need more carers and services.
In a nutshell, this controversial topic never fails to attract the public attention, we may safely reach the conclusion that it is disadvantageous to use medical technology to extend life expectancy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31275720165 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0007930218 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600823045267 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5502802041 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3076923077 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134898013538 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487959408875 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370786371254 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707287940702 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326757286968 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.