The claim that animals have "rights" has been subject to much of a debate since 1970. Are zoos helping or hurting animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree?
The role of zoos to preseve animal rights has always been under discussion. While some people think that zoos are assisting and exercising animal rights judiciously, however, other's maintain that zoos should be banned as they are hurting the animals and voilating their rights. This essay will discuss that why zoos should not be banned and be allowed to keep animals in the light of their rights.
Undoubetdly, zoos are playing an instrumental and pivotal role in maintaining animals of various species. There exists myriad arguments in favour of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that zoos house a variety of species which include rare species too. Moreover, with in the vicinity of zoo all species are provided with special food and extreme health care under the close supervision of trained as well as specialzed medical staff. For instance, panda which is an extinct specie is being flourished at zoos under extra care with special dietry routines and all these acts are being exercised in such a manner that no animal right is being voilated. As a result, there exists no reason that why zoos should be banned for helping and maintaining various kinds of animals.
Additionally, it is evitable that zoos try their utmost level and go beyond all limits to provide special treatment and extra care to animals subject to any kind of disease. Furthermore, law governing bodies also keep a strict check and balance on zoos to ensure that species are maintained in such a manner that animal rights are not voilated.
To conclude, zoos are maintaining animals and preserving their rights by ensuring extreme care and vigilance. In my opinion, zoos should not be banned and must be encouraged to house more animals so that various animals can be provided with maximum facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... specialzed medical staff. For instance, panda which is an extinct specie is bein...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, kind of, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.5418719212 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01342281879 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55002647367 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51677852349 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9486905252 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349076661165 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147877297815 0.0925447433944 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082806187223 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250937431389 0.151781067708 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795084504454 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.