The claim that animals have "rights" has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree?
Within forums of animal activists and animal lovers, much debate has gone on regarding the disadvantageous of zoos. They claim that zoos are harmful to animals and would rather that animals were left free to roam in the wild. Most of the arguments have weight but still there those with good intentions when it comes to keeping animals in zoo habitats. This essay will discuss why zoos are important and should be preserved.
On one hand, we have observed people keeping animals in shelters for entertainment and profit by creating shows such as the circus. There are also instances where animals have faced mistreatment and inadequate food while in zoos. These examples are some of those which make zoos harmful for animals but these cases are minimal and animal watch hardly allows this to go on for long without the action of either closing down those zoos or changing the management of such zoos.
Conversely, there are those zoos kept for preserving almost extinct species for the purpose of breeding them to increase numbers. Orphaned animals are also protected while in these zoos as they are vulnerable to predators and hunger while on their own in the natural habitat. These reasons are far too important and necessary for continuity of life to endangered animals. Furthermore, zoos also offer employment opportunities to people who genuinely care for wildlife.
In conclusion, despite tangible reasons being given for closing down zoos the advantages of running them far outweigh the few instances where animals have been treated unfairly. In my opinion, it is of colossal importance to continue keeping zoos and employing trained, honest animal lovers to manage these zoos for the greater good of animals that need them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are important and should be preserved. On one hand, we have observed people kee...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 470, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people who genuinely care for wildlife. In conclusion, despite tangible reasons ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, if, regarding, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1298245614 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55310841389 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571929824561 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3881481063 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.461538462 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274595304159 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111185427981 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552244680244 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19085461672 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776273444429 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.