Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change

nowadays, the importance of communication has become a long-running dispute among public all around the world, which leads to a moot question " it is advantages or not?". It is a widely held view that the communication is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must carefully weigh up the pros and cons of it.

To begin with, there are several reasons why I support that communication is one of the most important successes in this decade. First and foremost is that the communication provides people convenient which means people are able to easily make a connection with each other whenever they are or whenever they would like. In addition, individuals who live in dictators countries, they communication enable them to share their problems with other nation and prevent their authorities do not see the human right.

However, there is little room to doubt that the communication attributes many drawbacks for nations especially young. That is to say, in easy access communication are incorrect news can widespread easily without any control, so it leads to chaos in nations. For example, a group of reputable social scientist, working in a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to find the relationship between criminal rate and using mass media. Therefore, the result revealed that who use social media and communication without any censorship, are three times less be interested in scientific objects.

To recapitulate, I firmly believe that the advantages of the communication are far more outweigh the disadvantages. However every gardens may have some weed.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
nowadays, the importance of communication has be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... importance of communication has become a long-running dispute among public all around the wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...re far more outweigh the disadvantages. However every gardens may have some weed.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, to begin with, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34509803922 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13321799096 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643137254902 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5953475906 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.909090909 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871166098197 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322857286776 0.0925447433944 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209299649473 0.071462118173 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0472808169579 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101271111195 0.0609392437508 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.