Recently, the phenomenon of positive impacts and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that negative impacts can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, changeable communication can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as globalization, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this social responsibility and changing lifestyle apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of communication tools , positive change significantly in the last 10 years might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of modern type is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of family connection .
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of negative and positive changing communication far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this internet activity prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
---
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly, the phenomenon of positive impacts and its corresponding impacts have spark...
^^
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral standpoint, changeable communication can provide the society with some notice...
^^
Line 2, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al responsibility and changing lifestyle apparently can be seen. Within the r...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing lifestyle apparently can be seen. Within the realm of communication tools ...
^^^
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Within the realm of communication tools , positive change significantly in the l...
^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ithin the realm of communication tools , positive change significantly in the las...
^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sserted that the downside of modern type is correlated negatively with vital issu...
^^
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...preconceived notion of family connection . To conclude, while there are several ...
^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive and positive changing communication far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85294117647 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3868988008 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.697478991597 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.573195433 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.636363636 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.33497536946 169% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291661376633 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907152637357 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830596744251 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15384653823 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533275790781 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.