Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to communication media and its rapid change in the last decade. While it is possible to claim that the communication globalisation has more negative sides, my point of view that the positive effects outweigh the negative effects. In this essay, I shall explain my point of views while analysing different sides of the arguments to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad benefits the entire earth population received from the communication improvements such as integrity, confidentiality, availability, usability, portability, life quality, security, and information encapsulation. For instance, a mother can check the location of her son within few seconds through the internet. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the advantages of telecommunication and internet are practical.
On the other hand, there are few disadvantages the nations received from this improvement such as weak human relationships, industrial espionage, digital hackers, malware, and data illegal usages. For example, a drug dealer can provide the drug location through GPRS for its customer. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the telecommunication has practical disadvantages. But governments should implement rules and regulations.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the communication is in a fast track, and new social engineering tasks related to social media is one of the main risk. In nutshell, it is believed that the governments and professionals should implement systematics rules and regulations to mitigate the disadvantages related risks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7628458498 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47569524494 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584980237154 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9472352651 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151785808837 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450275133284 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725921345275 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762298833021 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922162760048 0.0609392437508 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.