Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change.
Recently, the phenomenon of developing communications and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that expanding communications can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, changing ways of communication can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that telecomunications, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a uiversity student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered social networks. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both mobile and e-mail phenomenon apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a scientific arena, decreasing facial contact might increase the consequences of the social behavior. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with increasing mental heal. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling argument on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of growing technology far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of globalization, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ording to my own experience, when I was a uiversity student, I performed an acade...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89224137931 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48695707591 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693965517241 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2797269061 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.272727273 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142351705053 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448199056249 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372084093434 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745076656218 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459317261449 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.55 8.32886699507 139% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.