The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication and had some negative and positive effects on individuals’ lives as well as on society. To what extent you are agreed or disagree?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative effects on individuals' lives due to the information revolution. While it is possible to claim that the information revolution is not good for the society, my point of view is that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. I shall explain my point of view while analysing the positive and negative sides of the argument.
First and foremost, there is a myriad of advantages individuals' can gain from information technology, such as high integrity, availability, confidentiality, usability and quality. Not only the above points but also it provides the portability and accountability. For example, Sri Lankan digital media companies provide high responsibility to their customers and merchants. Because of the above points, it is considered that the information technology revolution is the most important industry for individuals' lives.
On the other hand, those who believe the negative side has a different point of view and said that the mass communication destroys the individuals' life. For example, there are so many porn related videos are available in the internet and anyone can use those without any permission, and it destroys the privacy and security of individuals' lives. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the mass communication as a virus for the society. However, there are many ways that we must control the access levels for resources on the internet with high responsibility.
In conclusion, it is believed that the mass communication as the best thing for the practical world. In nutshell, governments and professionals should establish new rules and regulations for mass communication while removing the hazards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...hat the mass communication destroys the individuals life. For example, there are so many po...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun porn seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much porn', 'a good deal of porn'.
Suggestion: much porn; a good deal of porn
...viduals life. For example, there are so many porn related videos are available in the int...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47601476015 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28037846682 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553505535055 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2992527947 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.153846154 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212318579541 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741968265394 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525019886364 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121833147254 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462819644239 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.