The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication and had some negative and positive effects on individuals’
lives as well as on society.
To what extent you are agreed or disagree?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative effects on individuals' lives as well as on society due
to the information revolution. While it is possible to claim that the mass communication destroys the society, my point of view that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analyzing the positive and the negative sides of the argument.
First and foremost, there are myriad of advantages the society can gain because of the mass media, such as quality, availability, integrity, security, and usability. Apart from that, the mass communication provides the portability and the encapsulation also. For example, some of the Sri Lankan digital media companies provide above mention responsibilities for their customers and merchants. Because of the above points, it is taken into account that the information revolution provides more positive effects.
On the other hand, those who believe the negative side of the argument say that the mass communications destroy the individuals' life and the society. For example, internet related porn websites destroy the school children mind. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the mass communication removes the responsibility and the accountability of individuals' life. But, there are lots of methods we have to increase the accountability of mass communication with
high security.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the mass communication is the best industry that provides more services for the society. In nutshell, governments' and the professionals' should introduce rules and regulations for this to remove hazards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s the portability and the encapsulation also. For example, some of the Sri Lankan di...
^^^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nd the encapsulation also. For example, some of the Sri Lankan digital media companies prov...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...hat the mass communications destroy the individuals life and the society. For example, inte...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccountability of mass communication with high security. In conclusion, it is s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57528957529 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24468160787 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548262548263 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7207119285 50.4703680194 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.076923077 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236124528296 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805284611746 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584509243908 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126562029381 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408256810022 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.