Do you think design of buildings have positive or negative impact. Which way it can effect on work and live?”
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to modern buildings and its design. While it is possible to claim that the modern and old buildings have properly designed and there are no effects for work and live, my point of view that the well scientific developed buildings provide the best quality environment for the residences and for the employees. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are my myriad benefits building users can gain from a well-structured building such as quality, confidentiality, integrity, availability, usability, the speed of use, the speed of structure learn and internal encapsulation. For example, most of the United States modern buildings have the methodical design, and before the development of the building the government has been approved the design; therefore, most of the building users have a high-quality environment for work and live. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the building design is the basis for high-quality usage.
On the other hand, the well-designed building provides proper mental relaxation, legal aspects and disaster recovery for users. For instance, the world trade centre in Colombo provides most of the above mention facilities for the users; therefore, employees have the best efficiency. Because of the above point, it is considered the best design provides the usability.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the methodical design is the core for the better workforce. In nutshell, it is believed that the governments and the professionals should implement more risk-mitigated rules and regulations for a better future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40213523132 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07280897355 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533807829181 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4109995226 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.25397266985 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213462832736 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816231780464 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689074016292 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121475658894 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076314029861 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.