As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an aging population for individuals and society?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to an average life of human being and the modern medical technologies. While it is possible to claim that the old people are adding an extra pressure to the society, my point of view that everyone has equal rights to live in the society. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad of advantages a nation can gain from a long life such as life quality, family security, family confidentiality, life availability, and life integrity. For instance, China has increased the average human life expectancy by using modern medical facilities, and the old Chinees population are adding more values such as inherited features. Therefore, it is believed that the modern automated medical care has been improved the life quality of us.
On the other hand, those who believed the other side of the argument have a different point of view and say old people developed a complex culture. For example, children have to take care of their parents while working as employees, and it's an extra work for them. And they cannot focus on their day-to-day works. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the old generation is an extra weight for a developing or developed nation. But, in a democratic society and with human rights we cannot neglect the old generation.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the medical related technology should improve for a better life expectancy. In nutshell, it is believed that the government's and the professionals should add the old people to the country’s workforce.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03103448276 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85087340853 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520689655172 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7969426862 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.230769231 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256156665994 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846632871616 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620889395215 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142441118166 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303618708293 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.