It is important to maintain a right balance of your work and other respects of one’s life such as family and leisure, sport. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to correct life balance and side effects of it. While it is possible to claim that we live to work, my point of view is that we work to live. In this essay, I shall discuss my point of view while analysing the different sides of the argument to a great extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad of benefits a person and his family can take from the accurate life balance such as high life expectancy, life encapsulation, integrity, availability, confidentiality, and usability of life. For example, my parent had a proper life schedule and because of that me and my brother have enjoyed the life while focusing on our education. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the life balance is the best way for a proper well-being family life.
On the other hand, we can some indirect benefits from methodical life balancing such as good efficiency in production life, fresh thinking, new innovations for the world, and collaboration among other employment. For example, Google and Microsoft employees take their free time for sports or other extra event. Therefore, they have not much stress in the office and the employee and employer productivities are in very high level.
In conclusion, it is trusted that the human being must enjoy the life in the office as well as in their family life. In nut shell, it is strongly accepted that the governments and the employers must implement better quality policies and procedures for an accurate life balance for the nation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92647058824 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.788994917 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551470588235 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6308708664 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.818181818 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2727272727 7.25397266985 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187855294605 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073304648566 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03993787268 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111127397155 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209618577405 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.