In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So, it is impossible FOR A STUDENT to combine learning and employment at the same time, because one distracts the other. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your opinion with examples.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to modern education system. Most of the students work while learning in the universities. While it is possible to claim that education is a solo system in the monopoly market, my point of view is that the education is ongoing handover experience. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad of advantages from combining learning such as low learning curve, quality education, solution for unemployment, high employee availability, high confidentiality, high integrity and subject encapsulation. For example, most of the vocational training institutes have a proper understanding about this in China, and they direct their students for employment. Therefore, it is trusted by students that combine education as the best education system.
On the other hand, people who believe the other side of the argument thinks education needs a comfortable environment, peaceful teachers and time. For example, most of the physical science faculties in Sri Lanka have this type education system, and they deliver only theories for pupils. This kind of output is very important for academic environment only. Once they bind with the real production line, they cannot perform well.
In conclusion, it is accepted that the mix educational systems deliver more cognitive staff for this digital production line. In nutshell, professionals and governments should implement modern policies and regulations the improvement of vocational education.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 5.75862068966 417% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5390625 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02459804922 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3322194182 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14956063788 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053751142089 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037100130042 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866034217659 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440652313165 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.