Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions orideas to take any decisions. Discuss

Essay topics:

Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or
ideas to take any decisions. Discuss

In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative
effects on society due to company top level decisions and the employees suggestions. While it is
possible to claim that the top level management as the best decision takers, my point of view that the
bottom-up ideas are the best for better risk mitigations. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view
while analysing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.

First and foremost, there are myriad benefits a company can take from top level employees such as
high availability, integrity, confidentiality, quality, security, accountability, portability, usability and the
encapsulation of the company work. For example, multinational companies such as Google and Apple have
consider their bottom level employee decisition in the production line. Therefore, it is taken into consideration
that the all people should add their ideas for a quality decision.

On the other hand, those who believe the other side of the argument have a different point of view and say
top level managers have the better knowledge about the business planes and they have the accountability
for decision taking. For instance, some of the Sri Lankan employers have taken the top level decision for
the next generation of the business. But, I believe the most effective and quality decisions can be generated by
the all stakeholders in the business.

In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the total quality of a business is depend on total quality management,
and all employees and employers should participate for the decision making. In nutshell, professionals and governments
should establish policies and procedures to support this.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... companies such as Google and Apple have consider their bottom level employee dec...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...mpanies such as Google and Apple have consider their bottom level employee decisition ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 36, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ity for decision taking. For instance, some of the Sri Lankan employers have taken the top...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs have taken the top level decision for the next generation of the business. But...
^^^
Line 19, column 80, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...that the total quality of a business is depend on total quality management, and all ...
^^^^^^
Line 19, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s is depend on total quality management, and all employees and employers should p...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04353649013 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525362318841 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1887913054 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.909090909 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.25397266985 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.12807881773 436% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197134096357 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742945892817 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536718802086 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612301058133 0.151781067708 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712736652125 0.0609392437508 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.