Some people think school leavers should go to find a job rather than university education. Others think university education is essential for professional development. What’s your opinion of these two views?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to campus education and the employments. While it is possible to claim that the university education is the best, my point of view that a nation needs employers as well as employers, and this will balance the world. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing both sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad benefits a nation can gain from university education such as confidentiality, integrity, life availability, encapsulation, education inheritance, and life quality. For example, America has large number of university students, and they have a quality culture throughout the country. Therefore, it is accepted a nation needs more cognitive people. But America need to hire most of the bottom line employers from other countries.
On the other hand, those who believe the other side of the argument has a different point of view and say a nation needs more young energy. For example, most of the South Asian countries have more uneducated employers, and they have in a low or medium class life. Therefore, it is trusted that university education is not a must for a better-quality life. But people most of the people migrate for university education for more developed countries.
In conclusion, it is believed that a nation needs managers as well as workers. In nutshell, it is strongly believed that governments and professionals should implement scientific solutions to improve vocational education.
- Do you think driving and voting for youngsters below 25 year old is necessary 89
- To increase the price of fuel is the only way to reduce air pollution To what extent do you agree or disagree Use your own experience as examples 50
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is theproblem? What problem will this shortage of time cause? 80
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate this? 77
- Climate change 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2015503876 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01147575763 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527131782946 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.931034482759 644% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7160036603 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.230769231 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181833792406 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670899518362 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056269295368 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105242011116 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420706153442 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.