Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and
history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will
derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics
and cooking.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative
effects on society due to school subjects such as physics and their vocational behaviour. While it is
possible to claim that the chemistry, physics, and mathematics should remove, my point of view that the
schools should improve the quality of those subjects. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view
while analysing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad benefits a nation can gain from scientific core subjects such as
theoretical knowledge, usability, subject encapsulation, object oriented behaviour, subject inheritance,
technology verification, and subject validation. For example, all the engineering universities have approved
core subject for the vocational education. Therefore, it is taken into account that the core and
the theoretical subjects cannot replace by any other subject.
On the other hand, those who believed the other side of the argument say that the day-to-day education cannot
cover from school education, and the schools should add more practical subjects for the modern technological market.
For example, physics or history do not generate employees for the modern job market in India or China. Therefore,
it is taken into consideration that the new subjects should be added to cover the modern employee market. But,
the core of motor mechanics is physics.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the theory and practical knowledge essential for our daily life.
In nut shell, it is believed that the governments and professionals should take a scientific and tactical
decisions to mitigate this risk.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oriented behaviour, subject inheritance, technology verification, and subject val...
^^^
Line 15, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...job market in India or China. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the ...
^^^
Line 16, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o cover the modern employee market. But, the core of motor mechanics is physics. ...
^^^
Line 20, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls should take a scientific and tactical decisions to mitigate this risk.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54339622642 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92238265782 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2952877644 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.416666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.12807881773 436% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23614247835 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798699287081 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457144801635 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686828420175 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415458627374 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.