'Qualifications benefit individuals, therefore governments should make individuals meet the full costs of their education'. Do you agree with this statement?
There is no doubt that each and every individual take benefits from their academic and vocational qualifications, and free educational systems has been established to facilitate this .Qualifications related to the relevant field is a major requirement to join with a stable employer, while continue the job in a systematic manner. It is believed that, governments should take suitable actions to provide better quality education system, while expending full costs as funds.
First and foremost, every pupil in the society dreams to be a good professional in their career point of view such as a doctor, engineer. But, because of lack of fee, some pupils has to stop their education in the middle of the educational life. For example, in south Asia produces large percentage of individuals that are not suite for the country workforce. Therefore, it is taken in to account that, governments should take care of academic and theoretical educational system of the country.
On the other hand, each and every employee expects to recruits a good qualified whizz-kids to increase the efficiency of the organization. And they removes all the candidates that is not suitable for the organisation, and it's polices and guide lines. In this case, each government should analyse the job market and direct their funds to improve the identified sections that individuals cannot control. For example, heavy vehicle driver selection interviews consider most priority for the qualified individuals rather than experience individuals. Therefore, it is believed that governments should participate as a middle man arrange this problem in a sustainable manner.
In conclusion, although individuals does benefits from their own education, country can have more benefits rather than that. Therefore governments should direct adequate founds while establishing rules and regulations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... has been established to facilitate this .Qualifications related to the relevant f...
^^
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Qualifications
...as been established to facilitate this .Qualifications related to the relevant field is a majo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a systematic manner" with adverb for "systematic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...stable employer, while continue the job in a systematic manner. It is believed that, governments shoul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'recruit'.
Suggestion: recruit
...and, each and every employee expects to recruits a good qualified whizz-kids to increase...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'remove'
Suggestion: remove
...fficiency of the organization. And they removes all the candidates that is not suitable...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sustainable manner" with adverb for "sustainable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...te as a middle man arrange this problem in a sustainable manner. In conclusion, although individuals d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...an have more benefits rather than that. Therefore governments should direct adequate foun...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52447552448 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05514383596 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5868448132 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.538461538 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253054470542 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814637373395 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518324373259 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151303065428 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325423856179 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.