The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do u think should be responsible for solving it?
Is it the governments, organization or each individual?
Day by day, the environment that people has been living is transforming into more danger. There are lots of facts effect for this risk, such as: environment pollution, human behaviour etc. It is believed that governments should take the responsibility to mitigate the complex hazard.
First and foremost, environment pollution is one of the major issue that people faces in our day today life and individuals or organizations cannot solve. Environment pollution has been damaging to human life in many different aspects, and this cannot be controlled by individuals or organizations, but as a solution governments should provide rules and regulations to overcome this issue. For example, Indian government has published environment related acts in recent past to protect environment. It should be taken in to account that, this complex solution should be break down, analyse and solve the problem is on the hand of the government.
On the other hand, modern environment related problems should be included in to the school education system by the governments in theoretical and academic point of view. Pupils will study the problem as a subject and analyse the solution to different angles, but any of the organizations or individuals cannot interfere in to this matter. For example, Sweden government had included different kind of environment related problems with school syllabus and has been updating the syllabus. Therefore, it is believed that government must take the responsibility to insert this matter as a subject in to the school education.
In conclusion, each and every government should take the maximum responsibility to overcome this major issue, while facilitating contingency and disaster recovery planes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...tion has been damaging to human life in many different aspects, and this cannot be controlled ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'broken'?
Suggestion: broken
...t that, this complex solution should be break down, analyse and solve the problem is ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 5.75862068966 365% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4776119403 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09640346418 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511194029851 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9176235098 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247271618632 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932911647113 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333522147263 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148183508793 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407143912842 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.