Environment problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level.
In this modern ear, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about negative and positive impacts on the society due to environmental problems and different solutions. While it is possible to calm that the individual’s participation as the solution, my point of view is that the government level achievement outweighs individual participation. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing both sides of the argument.
First and foremost, there are lots of standard ways that the government can control the environmental problems. For example, the Australian government has conducted a large project call “Remove Junk in the space”, and spent the millions of dollars that an individual can’t spend. On the other hand, most of the government environment-related projects consist of better high-class standards and procedures. Because of the above points, it is taken into consideration that the government level achievement for the problem as the best solution.
On the other hand, those who believe that the individual environment management as the best solution has a different viewpoint and say to each and every individual in this world has the accountability about this problem. For example, come non-profit organizations get-together and conducted environment cleaning activities. Therefore, it is believed that the individual participation as the best solution. But any of the individuals can’t establish any of the rules and regulation for the nation without the government.
In conclusion, it is believed that the government level environment problem management as the best way to control this problem. In nutshell, I strongly recommend that the professional’s and government should establish a proper process to mitigate environmental related issues for a sustainable future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 5.75862068966 469% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73357664234 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53779175239 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518248175182 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7069189996 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.846153846 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224017140009 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847474547751 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635583625889 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144491449674 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256784580175 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.