'Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level.' To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people believe that ecological predicaments are substantially large to be handles by every person, hence genuine effects can only be realized through the intervention of the state. In my point of view, I partially assent to the foregoing argument due to small contributions that can make larger improvement for the former and the use of power to promulgate laws for the latter. This essay will discuss my justifications for the stated reasons.
To begin with, the detrimental conditions of mother nature nowadays have been a consistent concern since the past few years. With this awareness, individuals are already doing their part to help protect the biosphere. One of which is to have lesser dependency on cars as they also have the option to ride a bike or commute. Thus, a more vivid change could also been from the citizen's viewpoint.
On the other hand, the role of the government in resolving the planet's degradation cannot be ignored. In fact, the state that has the most authority to impose regulations pertaining to protection and preservation of natural resources. With this, it can be deduced that the leaders of every nation can take action and that it could result to vast difference when it comes to offering of environmental solutions.
To recapitulate, it is both the responsibility of each citizen as well as the state officials to address environmental issues encountered at this present time. A more viable approach could be to lend a helping hand and aim for the betterment of the entire surroundings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...e vivid change could also been from the citizens viewpoint. On the other hand, the ro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...role of the government in resolving the planets degradation cannot be ignored. In fact,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced that the leaders of every nation can take action and that it could result to ...
^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...both the responsibility of each citizen as well as the state officials to address environm...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, in fact, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06692913386 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00982385167 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641732283465 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2074901199 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188622815845 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605316824474 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509447408367 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104105826668 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301743959724 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.