In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
In numerous nations, young generations are already involving themselves on various of employment opportunities. Some individuals believed that this situation is not entirely acceptable, but others deem this circumstance as an essential part to venture in workplace, crucial for gaining knowledge and for –handling duty. In my perspective, I completely assent to the foregoing argument due to preparing oneself to work set-up and to acquire soft skills.
To begin with, students must experience working even though at an already age. It is necessary for them to understand and to have a clear view of what might happen to them in the future. This can be applied through being a working student. For example, Chinese families are often preparing their children become responsible especially in handling their businesses as early as 10 years old.
Moreover, one should also take into account to learn some vital skills. While at work with some regular employees, children can earn personal insights from them such as proper decision-making through listening and observing their behavior during working hours. With these, they can now apply it when the time they are able to secure a job.
To recapitulate, it is undoubtedly that any individual can obtain a wider perspective in life if he was able to have a career at a young age. Experiencing the workforce and at the same time attaining relevant skills can be the greatest asset one can have for his future occupation
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
In numerous nations, young generations are already involving themselves on various of employment opp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19246861925 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93565263725 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661087866109 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7180368005 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.416666667 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176261448846 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582577272339 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460237980255 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100684604493 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506273559155 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.