In the current education system, are assessments through formal written examinations still a valid method of assessing students? What is your opinion on this and support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
In the recent school curriculum, many people believe that evaluations by formal written tests are not a applicable means for assessing learners anymore. In my point of view, I oppose to the foregoing statement because of the method's effectiveness for assessment and to fully validate student's learning capabilities. This essay will discuss my justifications for the stated reasons.
To begin with, the present era of educations system has proliferated with the advancement of technology. However, this does not mean that written periodicals should be eliminated. This is for the reason that the best way to verify student's performance is through hard copies of exams. To illustrate, plenty of classroom assignments and projects done at home are accomplished by parents and not by the student themselves. Consequently, this situation will not effectively construe upon the real progress and ability of their children.
Apart from this, the pupils' learning abilities can be completely evaluated by allowing them to take written exams. The reported scores will be compared to the standard passing grade of the educational institution and teachers can be able to provide further feedback on what areas to improve from these data. For example, quarterly administered report cards are consulted by educators to the guardians and gives more attention on the student's low graded subjects for improvement.
To recapitulate, academic administrators should continue to practice written examinations to assess student's capabilities and learnings because this is still considered as the best method and will aid them to better understand their needs and focus subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...uations by formal written tests are not a applicable means for assessing learners...
^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'methods'' or 'method's'?
Suggestion: methods'; method's
... the foregoing statement because of the methods effectiveness for assessment and to ful...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, still, apart from, as to, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58498023715 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10609071474 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644268774704 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7152996919 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22271429888 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750318437643 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462448883111 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130986111704 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293562306965 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.