In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
Recently, children's paid work has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of it?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the psychology standpoint, children working is bound up inextricably with early life, which indicates it leads to both future life and grownup period. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between full time employment and child abuse as well as an exponential increase in stress. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of playing is correlated positively with not only personal achievement but also parent relationship.
Within the realm of economy, without the slightest doubt, family income attribute to jobs, in that it would come down to trip, leisure activity, and education. A salient example of such attribution is summer working, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take experience for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint financial support problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to poor family, economic situation, and even family members. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of government assistance and economic improvement.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the drawbacks of its far outweigh its benefits. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, childrens paid work has sparke...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the psychology standpoint, children...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 281, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...8 demonstrates the relationship between full time employment and child abuse as well as a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment but also parent relationship. Within the realm of economy, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sistance and economic improvement. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 33, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68458781362 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05839586716 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.709677419355 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8195593397 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0851929812963 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0239248598648 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360107759935 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0500078322449 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333900023378 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.