You are given climate as the field of study. Which area will you prefer? Explain why you picked up the particular area for your study?
Recently, choosing the interested field of study relating to climate has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "which area of climate will you prefer to study?". Whereas it is a widely held view that the topics relevant to climate is not interesting, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the climatology standpoint, climate areas are bound up inextricably with geography, which indicates they lead to both meteorology and environment. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between thermal global effect and earth pollution as well as an exponential increase in carbon dioxide. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of industrial products is correlated positively with not only species extinction but also green energy.
Within the realm of education, without the slightest doubt, interested field attribute to temperature zones, in that it would come down to desert region, drought, and deforestation. A salient example of such attribution is recycling process, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take air pollution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint climate change problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to nature conversation, hazard damage, and even gasoline fuel. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of renewable energy resources.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of environmental degradation study is the high significance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82130584192 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19236403093 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 139.433497537 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690721649485 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7084797036 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.307692308 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205312105122 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530255065973 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881271422091 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112810286353 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104098966193 0.0609392437508 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.