As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Recently, the phenomenon of increasing of average life expectancy and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of reducing food resources is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the old population can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, positive developments in developed countries can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of positive development, as well as life expectancy, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered reducing energy resources. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both spending too much money in medical cares and development in health care services apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the disadvantages of the aging population might increase the consequences of life longevity. Moreover, fundamental aspects of N9 could relate to this reality that the demerits of gap between different parts of societies pertain to living a long time. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of long retirement is correlated negatively with positive sign of health condition. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of long-living expectations.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of increasing the population in my experience far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of reducing work-forces prove the significance of living in hospitals, but also pinpoint medical expenses implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66431095406 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30642369685 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646643109541 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2922882535 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.583333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19584226923 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618716500208 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042784755835 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102453011936 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263366188216 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.