Computer technologies has had more of a negative than a positive impact on society. How far do you agree with this statement? Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the negative and positive impact on the society due to computer related technologies. While it is possible to claim that computers harmful for the society, my view is that the advantages outweigh the disadvantage. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing both sides of the argument.
First and foremost, there are several reasons why modern computer base systems provide more benefits, such as less human involvement, work in virtual environment and e-commerce. Efficiency is a major part of this, which optimise hundreds of human work into a minimum time period. For example, core banking computer base technologies can replace hundreds of banking staff in a modern bank. Because of the above point it is taken into consideration that, information technology provides more advantages than disadvantages.
On the other hand, those who argue for negative side have a different view point and say computers are harmful for the society and human being. For instant, new researches has found about computer systems can cause cancers and decrease thinking power of human being. Because of the above point it is taken in to account that, computer base systems are not suitable for human being and for the society.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that modern computer base information technology optimises the world and the society. In a nutshell, I would strongly recommend that government and professionals’ interference is essential to mitigate disadvantages into certain extent in a sustainable manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sustainable manner" with adverb for "sustainable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...igate disadvantages into certain extent in a sustainable manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34645669291 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00789462828 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6942565608 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148012512247 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587092948145 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325946548136 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910736624261 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388603686494 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.