Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste?
In the modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people on whether laws should be imposed to protect the environment or not. While, some people argue that imposing a law is inefficient in promoting recycling, on my point of view introducing legal requirement is the best step to get rid of this hazard. In this essay, I shall discuss factors strengthening my argument while analyzing both the advantages and disadvantages of it.
First and foremost, there are myriad of solutions available in disposing of waste. The most effective method is inrtoducing laws to the general public to direct them to recycle their waste. For instance, people can seperate their waste and take their waste to the recycling plants on regular time periods. In addition, governments has to establish a proper mechanism to receive these waste because most of the people who are living in apartments may not have a sufficient space to dispose their waste. Therefore, governments has to play a vital role in this process.
On the other hand, some people does not prefer legal enforcement. But, this is not practical in developing countries because these populations are driven by laws in nature. For an example, this method may be successful in developed countries, because of the self discipline they have. Therefore, a mere awareness programme together with the establishment of recycling centres islandwide will be sufficient for those countries in controlling waste disposal.
In conclusion, governments have to train society from their childhood to dispose their waste in a proper manner. So, they have to include those subjects into the national curriculum. In nutshell, governments has to impose laws and update them with current trends to achieve sustainable growth inside their country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ctive method is inrtoducing laws to the general public to direct them to recycle their waste. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... their childhood to dispose their waste in a proper manner. So, they have to include those subject...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25614035088 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92313765742 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582456140351 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.696884744 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8666666667 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278904785365 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083634269528 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716687992553 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151584450112 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536976230589 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.