EBook is better than the traditional library.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative impact on the society due to computer base portfolios such as eBooks and traditional libraries. While it is possible to claim, that the library system provides data to readers in a methodical way, my view is that the eBooks outweigh traditional library. I shall explain my point of view while analyzing both sides of the argument.
First and foremost, there are myriads of benefits for readers can gain from eBooks. EBooks have portability, efficiency, confidentiality, and security. Not only that, eBooks have availability also. For an instant, one can read eBooks anywhere and anytime without any trouble and can open it within a few seconds in their mobile device. Therefore it is taken into account, that eBooks as the future trend and more essential for the society.
On the other hand, those who argue the advantages of a traditional library have a different viewpoint and say, that the modern pupils need paper base reading. They pinpoint the integrity as the main point. Moreover, once the electronic hard disk corrupted all eBooks will be destroyed. Because of the above point, it is taken into consideration, that the library system is more sophisticated. But nowadays, there are lots of contingency and disaster recovery methods available as a solution for this.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that every book in the traditional library system should transform into an eBook for a sustainable future. In nutshell, it is strongly believed that the professional’s and the government’s participation are essential to conducting such a transformation project in a cognitive manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a methodical way" with adverb for "methodical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...library system provides data to readers in a methodical way, my view is that the eBooks outweigh tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...Not only that, eBooks have availability also. For an instant, one can read eBooks an...
^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...n a few seconds in their mobile device. Therefore it is taken into account, that eBooks a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a cognitive manner" with adverb for "cognitive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...onducting such a transformation project in a cognitive manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29779411765 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14272438934 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591911764706 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.6157635468 238% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2786727938 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0666666667 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197674603905 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060983829332 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613868954051 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112046954301 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459030489061 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.