Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons of this change. Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience

The effect of big shopping centres on replacing small stores, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of large shopping malls has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on small shops in recent years. It can be agreed that substituting small stores with huge stores has some positive impacts, but some people claim that it has some negative impacts as well. This essay will elaborate benefits and drawbacks of large shopping malls and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are numerous reasons why replacing small stores with big mall centres is beneficial, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that these large places allow people to save time because they can buy groceries and clothes, all under the same roof. For instance, Wall mart has all stuff under one roof with wholesale prices, so people do not need to rush to so many places to buy products. Large stores, therefore, can play a vital role to save time when shopping.

Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of substituting small stores for huge ones, but the most alarming one lies in the fact that big mall centres have largely affected local market and economy by taking small businesses owners out of the way. As an illustration, small convenience stores have closed due to the pressure of wholesale store prices and cheap offers. Replacing small business, hence, can have negative impacts on small local business owners.

From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of changing small stores with big mall centres is prominent, although there are some drawbacks that should be well handled.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10380622837 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5431325443 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557093425606 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.6114945915 50.4703680194 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.090909091 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0561796269615 0.242375264174 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0238189360101 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280787547392 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.043957261494 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311260622616 0.0609392437508 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.