One of the most conspicuous trend of today's world is significant evolution of communication in the last decade. With the advancement in communications has become the gateway of various issues . There are merits and demerits of this issue, although i m of opinion that former on to the later.
There are deluge of arguments that are in favor of my stance. One of the most preponderant is that due to introductions of various features in mobiles, internet, one can treat the world as village. Apart from these, it helps to resolve the issue of sound quality. For instant, the most admirable feature is video calling which facilitates ones to see their person which are sitting millions of miles away from them.Needless to say, all these merits are stand mankind in good stead when evolution i communication is considered.
As such, however thee are some pitfalls which can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of the evolution in communications. Primarily, as it is responsible for deficiency of nonverbal communications which includes implicit messages like communicate with emotions either by hugging or shaking the hand. People are now more interested to be hangout with their friends by online only. Hence, it is apparent that why many people are against of this advancement.
In the view the arguments are outlined above, one can conclude that, though there are some drawbacks but the benefits are indeed to great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
One of the most conspicuous trend of todays world is significant evolutio...
^^
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st conspicuous trend of todays world is significant evolution of communication i...
^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...has become the gateway of various issues . There are merits and demerits of this i...
^^
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deluges'?
Suggestion: deluges
...that former on to the later. There are deluge of arguments that are in favor of my st...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to introductions of various features in mobiles, internet, one can treat the wor...
^^
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... these, it helps to resolve the issue of sound quality. For instant, the most adm...
^^
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Needless
...itting millions of miles away from them.Needless to say, all these merits are stand mank...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cations. Primarily, as it is responsible for deficiency of nonverbal communicatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10638297872 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95975107069 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604255319149 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3510890187 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0983923741577 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361402542702 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714103949558 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647811478915 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757027901999 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.