Companies can progress by good communion and collaboration between the employers and staff. Good incentives, individualistic approach, recognition and a pat on the back for the successful completion of a project can enhance the enthusiasm and can lead the company to visionary targets and goals.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement.
Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your experience and observations.
Individual success or company progress depends on how an employee devotes himself to the work assigned to him. There should be good communication between employees and employer in order to take the company to the next higher level. I strongly support this opinion and believe that the staff should be provided with perks, recognition and excellence awards for their hard work. In the forthcoming essay, I will discuss the extent of my agreement with this statement and comes to a plausible point. The first and foremost reason that substantiate my point of view is that every employee gives his most of the hours to the company by working on visionary targets set by the company. He burns his midnight oil to achieve those goals. In this scenario, if a person will get rewarded then this will help him in attaining happiness which after all leads to success. For instance, a recognized employee try to innovate things by providing new ideas. Another pivotal facet of this statement is related to staff who do not get a pat on their back, which ultimately results in losing their interest in the field they are working. For example, a person facing a lack of attention may feel offended and this might hamper his project growth. I have seen this type of scenarios where employees leave the companies just to get into a better place. To recapitulate from the aforementioned statements I would like to epitomize that in order to attain heights like skyscrapers, companies should treat their employees with due respect and should increase their enthusiasm so that they will contribute to the success of the company.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, thus, after all, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90476190476 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66542357211 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611721611722 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1149613641 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.583333333 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127188162649 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045834233736 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368134028535 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127188162649 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.