Company’s top level authorities should get their Employees in decision-making process. Discus Organizations involve employees in decision making process of their products and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both.
These days more and more companies involve their employees in the decision-making process. This idea has become popular, especially in the last decade. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this dramatic change in organizations.
Employee involvement in decision-making has a lot of benefits. Harvard University researchers undertook a study to understand the relationship between employee involvement and other measures. The results revealed that higher involvement level is positively correlated with higher performance, more satisfaction and higher productivity at the corporate level. Those who were involved in the decision-making were three times more likely to outperform their peers in performance evaluation, twice as likely to be happy with their jobs and five times more likely to bring in new ideas. The relationship between employees’ involvement and each of these three variables was statistically significant. As a result, scientific research supports the hypothesis that employee involvement is advantageous.
However, it has some drawbacks as well. In some cases, it may lead to employees’ confusion and frustration. A group of organizational psychologists at Stanford University conducted an experiment in 2015 to measure the effect of involvement on employees’ performance. They realized that although being involved in decision-making makes people more creative and productive, it also makes people confused and frustrated. Members of the treatment group had higher stress levels mainly because they had to do an unstructured task.
In a nutshell, employee involvement is associated with higher performance, satisfaction and productivity. It may also result in employees’ confusion and frustration. I think its advantages outweigh its disadvantages substantially. Therefore, different organizations can benefit from this new initiative in management.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, i think, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15241635688 5.00649968141 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.72087947933 2.71678728327 137% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565055762082 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.232595043 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9444444444 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9444444444 20.9669160288 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369794074906 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109541702164 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991837431887 0.071462118173 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216208276758 0.151781067708 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549344226805 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 53.1260098522 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.8 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.